add url-parameter cql-filter to geonode mapstore for filtering feature attributes by url#608
Open
ffischer1984 wants to merge 1 commit intoGeoNode:masterfrom
Open
add url-parameter cql-filter to geonode mapstore for filtering feature attributes by url#608ffischer1984 wants to merge 1 commit intoGeoNode:masterfrom
ffischer1984 wants to merge 1 commit intoGeoNode:masterfrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
if you have web-applications which consume data in form of embbed_urls this is extremely helpful. This changes enables the geonode to filter feature attributes by url. Here are some examples:
further documentation how cql-filters work:
It's so extremely useful for sub-applications which consumes data of geonode I don't know why this isn't in the main-branch of geonode. In case of any security-/performance-concerns please let us know and I'll reconsider this.
CLOSE #609